Key Points
- Harrow Online posed the question on Facebook: “Should Harrow be building more flats or slowing down?” reaching tens of thousands and garnering over 100 comments.
- Majority of residents oppose further development, citing overdevelopment and infrastructure strain including overcrowding, parking shortages, traffic congestion, insufficient schools, GP services, hospitals, and declining quality of life.
- Mandy Douch commented: “Slowing down making makeshift flats that need repairs all the time, too many cars, not enough schools, hospitals, doctors, dentists, streets are a mess, too much dumping crap, Harrow’s not like it used to be.”
- Dave Dunn stated: “Less water pressure and bills still going up, more brown envelopes, more disease flying around, lack of classroom space, more benefits paying out while taxes go up.”
- Rachel J Kumar said: “The market is flooded with flats that aren’t selling yet they are building more and more. New flats are being sold through Help to Buy and when the five years are up and they have to start repaying the loan, people try to sell but it’s impossible to get back what they paid because you can get new flats for the same. The only people making money are the developers.”
- Loz Crust remarked: “How about fixing the infrastructure to account for thousands of new homes that have already been built. You can’t just keep bringing more people to Harrow without fixing the traffic and parking issues we already struggle with.”
- Steve Forey noted: “Too many new flats without any accompanying investment in infrastructure – roads, street cleaning, NHS upgrades, more GPs, community hubs etc – is leading to an ongoing decline in the quality of life.”
- Peter Ockenden added: “Slow down any high-rise flats and put in place enough car parking spaces for said flats.”
- Ray McCullough suggested: “Build council flats so people who can’t afford to buy or rent can have somewhere to live without getting ripped off.”
- Bhagvati Mistry highlighted: “Agreed! The flats built where the Kodak building was have no parking. Instead, residents of those flats have started parking on residential roads. The council should know this!”
- A small minority supports more homes, emphasising need for affordable council housing.
- Cllr Marilyn Ashton, Deputy Leader of Harrow Council, explained: “Planning applications are mostly from the private sector. The Council is the Planning Authority, which must determine planning applications by applying adopted planning policies. Therefore, the question posed here cannot be sensibly addressed without first understanding the legal framework in which all planning authorities must operate. Furthermore, in the event that the Council refuses planning permission, the applicant has the right to appeal to the Inspectorate, which will end up allowing the appeal if the Council’s grounds for refusal are unsound and not based on adopted policies. In addition, for larger developments, the Mayor of London can call them in and can grant them over the Council’s head.”
- Broader context from Harrow Local Plan consultations shows mixed support for housing targets, with concerns over infrastructure deficits, traffic, crime, and loss of character; public representations note pressure on burdened systems and preference for family homes over flats.
- Poets Corner development at former Harrow Civic Centre proposes 536 homes in first phase (part of 1,000+ by 2034), with 20% affordable housing below 40% target, reduced heights to 12 storeys, no new school, sparking similar resident worries over parking, GPs, shops, and green space.
- Residents in Poets Corner debate criticised lack of large park, inadequate affordable units on council land, and ongoing traffic issues from prior sites; Cllr Marilyn Ashton called it “a major step forward”; Leigh Johnson of Wates Residential described it as “once-in-a-generation opportunity”.
- Related sentiments in other polls: Harrow seen as worse than 10 years ago due to overdevelopment, flats, HMOs, litter, fly-tipping; some praise regeneration but many lament lost character.
- Recent approvals include nine-storey block of 63 flats with no affordable homes in town centre, despite objections; other refusals label schemes “overbearing and out of character”.
Harrow, London (harrow london) January 16, 2026 – Residents of Harrow have overwhelmingly voiced opposition to further flat construction amid mounting concerns over infrastructure overload, as revealed in a viral Harrow Online Facebook poll that ignited widespread debate across the borough.
Why Are Harrow Residents Calling to Slow Down Development?
The Harrow Online Facebook post, which queried “Should Harrow be building more flats or slowing down?”, exploded in engagement, reaching tens of thousands and drawing over 100 comments from locals. Most respondents argued the borough faces overdevelopment, with infrastructure failing to match population growth. Common grievances included overcrowding, parking shortages, traffic jams, strained schools, GP services, hospitals, and a perceived erosion of quality of life, as the borough transforms too rapidly.
As reported in the Harrow Online article by its editorial team, Mandy Douch captured the sentiment: “Slowing down making makeshift flats that need repairs all the time, too many cars, not enough schools, hospitals, doctors, dentists, streets are a mess, too much dumping crap, Harrow’s not like it used to be.” Similarly, Dave Dunn highlighted everyday strains: “Less water pressure and bills still going up, more brown envelopes, more disease flying around, lack of classroom space, more benefits paying out while taxes go up.” These views echo findings from the Draft Harrow Local Plan 2021-2041 consultations, where public representations decried additional housing pressuring already burdened infrastructure, including health services and schools.
What Specific Infrastructure Issues Plague Harrow?
Parking emerged as a flashpoint, with residents pointing to new flats exacerbating street congestion. Bhagvati Mistry wrote on the Harrow Online Facebook thread: “Agreed! The flats built where the Kodak building was have no parking. Instead, residents of those flats have started parking on residential roads. The council should know this!” Loz Crust urged: “How about fixing the infrastructure to account for thousands of new homes that have already been built. You can’t just keep bringing more people to Harrow without fixing the traffic and parking issues we already struggle with.”
Steve Forey elaborated: “Too many new flats without any accompanying investment in infrastructure – roads, street cleaning, NHS upgrades, more GPs, community hubs etc – is leading to an ongoing decline in the quality of life.” Peter Ockenden reinforced: “Slow down any high-rise flats and put in place enough car parking spaces for said flats.” Such concerns align with Poets Corner feedback, where locals bemoaned absent GP surgeries, shops, schools, and parking, referencing traffic chaos at other recent developments.
How Does the Housing Market Factor In?
Rachel J Kumar dissected the economics: “The market is flooded with flats that aren’t selling yet they are building more and more. New flats are being sold through Help to Buy and when the five years are up and they have to start repaying the loan, people try to sell but it’s impossible to get back what they paid because you can get new flats for the same. The only people making money are the developers.” Local Plan feedback noted apartments as unsuitable for families and of poor quality, with doubts on infrastructure viability.
What Do Supporters of More Building Say?
Though a minority, some advocated for targeted expansion. Ray McCullough proposed: “Build council flats so people who can’t afford to buy or rent can have somewhere to live without getting ripped off.” A Facebook commenter suggested: “Harrow should build flats and rent them out to working people (not on benefits) charge normal rent and working people would have a better life.” The Annual Housing Report 2024 noted completion of 89 new homes via council initiatives, supporting families in temporary accommodation.
In Poets Corner context, developer Leigh Johnson, Regional Development Director at Wates Residential, as reported by Harrow Online, described the project as a “once-in-a-generation opportunity” to revitalise with sustainable homes and public spaces.
What Is the Council’s Position on Planning Limits?
Cllr Marilyn Ashton, Deputy Leader of Harrow Council, responded comprehensively on Harrow Online: “Planning applications are mostly from the private sector. The Council is the Planning Authority, which must determine planning applications by applying adopted planning policies. Therefore, the question posed here cannot be sensibly addressed without first understanding the legal framework in which all planning authorities must operate. Furthermore, in the event that the Council refuses planning permission, the applicant has the right to appeal to the Inspectorate, which will end up allowing the appeal if the Council’s grounds for refusal are unsound and not based on adopted policies. In addition, for larger developments, the Mayor of London can call them in and can grant them over the Council’s head.”
She reiterated this for Poets Corner, calling it “a major step forward” despite viability challenges limiting affordable housing to 20% against a 40% target; plans dropped a primary school due to fluctuating demand.
Why Is Overdevelopment a Recurring Theme in Harrow?
Recent polls reflect deeper discontent. In a Harrow Online survey “Is Harrow better now than it was 10 years ago?”, many deemed it worse, blaming flats, HMOs, fly-tipping, litter, and overdevelopment; Steve Forey repeated: “Too many people packed in to a small space. All about property speculation, profit for property developers, more revenue for the Council without any proportional increase in infrastructure.” John Ingram said: “Far, far worse with all the flats and HMO’s and it is still getting worse never mind the fly tipping and litter.”
Local Plan Reg 22 Statement detailed mixed housing support, favouring family homes and controls on flats/HMOs, but concerns over Opportunity Area’s 7,500 homes straining traffic, crime, and character; housebuilders questioned delivery feasibility. A nine-storey, 63-flat development sans affordable units was approved despite objections, while others faced refusal as “overbearing”.
What Do Broader Reports Reveal About Housing Pressures?
The LSE CASE report on overcrowding in similar London boroughs noted severe issues in social housing, with 36% overcrowded in some wards, underscoring supply shortages amid limited options. Harrow’s site selection methodology for the Local Plan emphasises 20-year growth planning.sticerd.
Residents’ calls blend immediate frustrations with systemic critiques, demanding infrastructure parity before expansion. The debate underscores tensions between housing needs and liveability in this north-west London borough
