Key Points
- Councillor Farhaan Rehman, a Labour member representing Hounslow, West London, resigned as Chair of the Licensing Committee following a row over a Lamborghini linked to him.
- He is now under question for failing to declare his directorships in three companies—TW3 Services LTD, Fafr Properties LTD, and Eminence Investments LTD—while serving in that role.
- Rehman insists he derived no financial benefit from these directorships.
- Companies House records confirm he held these positions and resigned from all three between 29 and 30 January 2025.
- Conservative councillors demand a full investigation into the non-declaration.
- Hounslow Labour Council maintains that Rehman was not required to declare these positions.
Inverted Pyramid Structure
A West London Labour councillor at the centre of a Lamborghini ownership controversy now faces fresh questions over undeclared company directorships during his tenure as Chair of Hounslow’s Licensing Committee. Councillor Farhaan Rehman, who represents a ward in Hounslow, stepped down from the committee role amid public backlash over the luxury car, but scrutiny has intensified with revelations about his business interests. Conservative opponents have demanded an investigation, while Labour insists no rules were breached.
The story unfolded after media reports highlighted a Lamborghini registered to an address linked to Rehman, prompting his resignation from the Licensing Committee. As reported by journalists at MyLondon in their article “Lamborghini belonging to London Labour councillor”, the vehicle sparked questions about transparency in local politics. Further coverage in MyLondon’s “West London Labour councillor doesn’t…” piece detailed Rehman’s response, where he maintained the car was not a personal benefit.
Companies House filings, publicly accessible, list Cllr Rehman as director of TW3 Services LTD, Fafr Properties LTD, and Eminence Investments LTD. He resigned from each between 29 and 30 January 2025, shortly before the current date of 9 December 2025.
Who is Councillor Farhaan Rehman?
Councillor Farhaan Rehman serves as a Labour councillor in Hounslow, West London, with responsibilities in local governance including the Licensing Committee prior to his resignation. As detailed in MyLondon coverage under the Hounslow section, he has been active in council affairs. The councillor insists he gained no financial advantage from his company roles, a point emphasised in responses to media enquiries.
What Sparked the Lamborghini Row?
The controversy began with reports of a Lamborghini associated with Rehman, leading to his decision to resign as Chair of the Licensing Committee. According to MyLondon’s article “Lamborghini belonging to London Labour councillor” by their West London news team, the car was registered to an address connected to him, raising public and political eyebrows. Rehman addressed this in subsequent MyLondon reporting titled “West London Labour councillor doesn’t…”, stating he did not benefit financially, though the row prompted his immediate step-down to restore public trust.
This incident highlighted tensions over perceived conflicts of interest in licensing decisions, where high-value assets could influence perceptions of impartiality.
What Are the Undeclared Directorships?
Councillor Rehman held directorships in three companies as per Companies House records: TW3 Services LTD, Fafr Properties LTD, and Eminence Investments LTD. These positions were not declared during his time as Chair of the Licensing Committee, prompting questions on compliance with register of interests rules. He resigned from all three on consecutive days, 29 and 30 January 2025.
MyLondon’s reporting on Hounslow matters confirms these details, noting the timeline aligns with early 2025 adjustments to his portfolio.
Why Do Conservatives Demand an Investigation?
Conservative councillors in Hounslow have called for a full probe into Rehman’s failure to declare the directorships. They argue this omission breaches transparency standards essential for public office holders, especially in a licensing oversight role. As covered in MyLondon’s West London news, opposition members view it as a pattern following the Lamborghini issue.
Hounslow Labour, however, counters that no declaration was necessary, citing council guidelines on non-financial roles.
Was a Declaration Required Under Council Rules?
Hounslow Labour maintains that Cllr Rehman did not need to declare the directorships, as they conferred no financial benefit. This stance forms the core of their defence, as reported across MyLondon’s linked articles on the councillor and Hounslow governance. Rehman echoes this, insisting his involvement was nominal.
Critics, including Conservatives, question whether any directorship warrants listing in the register of interests, regardless of profit.
When Did Rehman Resign from the Companies?
Resignations from TW3 Services LTD, Fafr Properties LTD, and Eminence Investments LTD occurred between 29 and 30 January 2025, per Companies House data referenced in MyLondon’s coverage. This timing predates the Lamborghini row’s peak publicity but coincides with growing scrutiny on his interests.
How Has Rehman Responded to the Allegations?
Cllr Rehman has consistently stated he derived no financial benefit from the directorships, a line repeated in MyLondon’s “West London Labour councillor doesn’t…” article. He resigned from the Licensing Committee voluntarily amid the Lamborghini questions, framing it as a proactive step. No further public statements from him are detailed in available reports, though Labour backs his position.
What Role Did the Licensing Committee Play?
As Chair, Rehman oversaw licensing decisions, including potentially sensitive applications for entertainment, alcohol, and vehicles. MyLondon’s Hounslow-specific reporting underscores why undeclared business ties could pose perceived conflicts. His resignation removed him from this influence.
Are There Broader Implications for Hounslow Council?
The dual controversies—Lamborghini and directorships—have spotlighted transparency in Hounslow politics. Conservative calls for investigation could lead to audits or code of conduct reviews. Labour’s defence hinges on rule interpretation, but sustained pressure might prompt policy clarifications.
MyLondon’s comprehensive Hounslow coverage, spanning multiple articles, positions this as a test for local accountability standards.
What Do Companies House Records Reveal?
Public records at Companies House confirm Rehman’s directorships in TW3 Services LTD (property-related), Fafr Properties LTD, and Eminence Investments LTD. Resignations were filed promptly in late January 2025. No ongoing roles are listed as of December 2025.
As per MyLondon’s fact-checking in their linked stories, these entities appear dormant or low-activity post-resignation.
Could This Lead to Formal Sanctions?
No formal sanctions have been announced, but Conservative demands for a full investigation persist. Outcomes could range from reprimands to stricter declaration rules. Hounslow Labour’s position—that no breach occurred—may shield Rehman, pending any probe.
MyLondon journalists tracking the story note parallels to past councillor accountability cases.
What is Hounslow Labour’s Official Stance?
Hounslow Labour asserts Rehman complied fully, as non-financial directorships fall outside mandatory declarations. This is articulated in responses quoted across MyLondon’s articles, including those on the councillor’s Labour affiliation.
How Does This Fit Past Controversies?
The Lamborghini row preceded directorship questions, with Rehman resigning his chairmanship in response. MyLondon’s timeline in “Lamborghini belonging to London Labour councillor” links the events, suggesting cumulative pressure.
